brew install git
sudo apt-get install git
sudo yum install git
How to initialize a repository
Once Git is installed on your system, you are able to access it using the command line by typing
Suppose you have a clean folder. You can initialize a Git repository by typing
What does this command do? It creates a
.gitfolder in the folder where you ran it. If you don’t see it, it’s because it’s a hidden folder, so it might not be shown everywhere, unless you set your tools to show hidden folders.
Anything related to Git in your newly created repository will be stored into this
.gitdirectory, all except the
.gitignorefile, which I’ll talk about in the next article.
How to add files to a repository
Let’s see how a file can be added to Git. Type:
echo "Test" > README.txt
to create a file. The file is now in the directory, but Git was not told to add it to its index, as you can see what
git statustells us:
Add the file to the staging area
We need to add the file with
git add README.txt
to make it visible to Git, and be put into the staging area:
Once a file is in the staging area, you can remove it by typing:
git reset README.txt
But usually what you do once you add a file is commit it.
How to commit changes
Once you have one or more changes to the staging area, you can commit them using
git commit -am "Description of the change"
This cleans the status of the staging area:
and permanently stores the edit you made into a record store, which you can inspect by typing
When you commit a file to Git, you are committing it into the current branch.
Git allows you to work simultaneously on multiple, separate branches, different lines of development which represent forks of the main branch.
Git is very flexible: you can have an indefinite number of branches active at the same time, and they can be developed independently until you want to merge one of them into another.
Git by default creates a branch called
master. It’s not special in any way other than it’s the one created initially.
You can create a new branch called
git checkout -b develop
git branchcommand lists the branches that the repository has.
When creating the new branch, that branch points to the latest commit made on the current branch. If you switch to it (using
git checkout develop) and run
git log, you’ll see the same log as the branch that you were previously.
Push and pull
In Git you always commit locally. This is a very nice benefit over SVN or CSV where all commits had to be immediately pushed to a server.
You work offline, do as many commits as you want, and once you’re ready you push them to the server, so your team members, or the community if you are pushing to GitHub, can access your latest and greatest code.
Push sends your changes.
Pull downloads remote changes to your working copy.
Before you can play with push and pull, however, you need to add a remote!
Add a remote
A remote is a clone of your repository, positioned on another machine.
I’ll do an example with GitHub. If you have an existing repository, you can publish it on GitHub. The procedure involves creating a repository on the platform, through their web interface, then you add that repository as a remote, and you push your code there.
To add the remote type
git remote add origin https://github.com/YOU/REPONAME.git
An alternative approach is creating a blank repo on GitHub and cloning it locally, in which case the remote is automatically added for you
Once you’re done, you can push your code to the remote, using the syntax
git push <remote> <branch>, for example:
git push origin master
originas the remote, because you can technically have more than one remote. That is the name of the one we added previously, and it’s a convention.
The same syntax applies to pulling:
git pull origin master
tells Git to pull the
origin, and merge it in the current local branch.
In both push and pull there is a problem to consider: if the remote contains changes incompatible with your set of commits, the operation will fail.
This happens when the remote contains changes subsequent to your latest pull, which affects lines of code you worked on as well.
In the case of push this is usually solved by pulling changes, analyzing the conflicts, and then making a new commit that solves them.
In the case of pull, your working copy will automatically be edited with the conflicting changes, and you need to solve them, and make a new commit so the codebase now includes the problematic changes that were made on the remote.
Command Line vs Graphical Interface
Up to now I talked about the command line Git application.
This was key to introduce you to how Git actually works, but in the day-to-day operations, you are most likely to use an app that exposes you those commands via a nice UI, although many developers I know like to use the CLI.
The CLI (command line) commands will still prove themselves to be useful if you need to setup Git using SSH on a remote server, for instance. It’s not useless knowledge at all!
That said, there are many very nice apps that are made to simplify the life of a developer that turn out very useful especially when you dive more into the complexity of a Git repository. The easy steps are easy everywhere, but things could quickly grow to a point where you might find it hard to use the CLI.
Some of the most popular apps are
Free, at the time of writing only available for Mac and Win
Paid, at the time of writing only available for Mac and Win
Free / Paid depending on the needs, for Mac, Win and Linux
A good Git workflow
Different developers and teams like to use different strategies to manage Git effectively. Here is a strategy I used on many teams and on widely used open source projects, and I saw used by many big and small projects as well.
The strategy is inspired by the famous A successful Git branching model post.
I have only 2 permanent branches: master and develop.
Those are the rules I follow in my daily routine:
When I take on a new issue, or decide to incorporate a feature, there are 2 main roads:
The feature is a quick one
The commits I’ll make won’t break the code (or at least I hope so): I can commit on develop, or do a quick feature branch, and then merge it to develop.
The feature will take more than one commit to finish
Maybe it will take days of commits before the feature is finished and it gets stable again: I do a feature branch, then merge to develop once ready (it might take weeks).
If something on our production server requires immediate action, like a bugfix I need to get solved ASAP, I do a short hotfix branch, fix the thing, test the branch locally and on a test machine, then merge it to master and develop.
Develop is unstable. Master is the latest stable release
The develop branch will always be in a state of flux, that’s why it should be put on a ‘freeze’ when preparing a release. The code is tested and every workflow is checked to verify code quality, and it’s prepared for a merge into master.
Every time develop or another hotfix branch is merged into master, I tag it with a version number, and if on GitHub I also create a release, so it’s easy to move back to a previous state if something goes wrong.
More git tutorials:
- A Git Cheat Sheet
- Git workflow to manage work on multiple branches
- An easy way to handle Git subrepositories
- An incomplete list of great Git tutorials
- A developer's introduction to GitHub
- The complete Git guide
- How to discover a bug using git bisect
- How to make your first Pull Request on GitHub
- How to update a Git branch from another branch
- I posted my password / API key on GitHub
- Squashing Git commits
- How to remove a Git remote